Sherry Chandler » Some things I learned about our 43 first ladies

Some things I learned about our 43 first ladies

Well, not all 43 really.

And technically, we haven’t had 43 first ladies. Some of our presidents were bachelors or widowers during their time in office. These men asked daughters or nieces or daughters-in-law to serve as hostess for them. Woodrow Wilson, on the other hand, became widowed and remarried while in the White House, so he had two first ladies. So if you define “first lady” as meaning a woman married to the President of the United States during his time in office, we’ve only had 37.

In their article “The Real Mrs. Lincoln” (The Lincoln Herald, Spring 2008), Watson, Berger, and Yon consider what a strange position “first lady” actually is:

First ladies are neither elected nor appointed, there is no constitutional or statutory basis for their “office,” and, therefore, no firmly established roles or responsibilities for presidential wives. Often, first ladies end up forging their approach to the office according to their personal inclination, the nature of the presidential marriage, and within the parameters of public opinion, prevailing sex role norms, and historical precedent.

In addition to the “scholarly rankings” I talked about last post, Watson et al. include several other comparison tables for first ladies that I found fascinating.

Take education. Six of our first 14 first ladies had “none.” That is 16% of our presidential wives, up through the Civil War to Eliza Johnson, who have had no formal education. That includes Martha Washington and Dolley Madison. Abigail Fillmore had “some.” Eleven (30%) have gone to finishing school. Our “finished” ladies include Mary Todd Lincoln, Eleanor Roosevelt, Jackie Kennedy, Lady Bird Johnson, and Nancy Reagan. Florence Harding went to a music conservatory and Betty Ford studied dance at the Calla Travis Dance Studio. Fifteen (40%) have gone to college, and Rosalyn Carter went to junior college. Hillary Rodham Clinton, with her Yale Law degree, is arguably our most highly (and impressively) educated first lady to date, most closely followed by Laura Bush, who has a Masters Degree in Library Science from University of Texas in Austin. If Barack Obama is elected, Michelle will become our second Ivy-League lawyer in the role of first lady.

Francis Cleveland was the youngest first lady, being 21 when she entered the White House. Anna Harrison was the oldest at 65 (Barbara Bush was 64, Nancy Reagan a young 59). Anna Harrison also had the most children: 9. Sarah Polk and Edith Wilson had none.

As you might expect, Jackie Kennedy has had the most “biographical works” (37), followed by Eleanor Roosevelt (35), Hillary Rodham Clinton (27), and Mary Todd Lincoln (19). Twelve, including Eleanor Roosevelt, Betty Ford, Rosalyn Carter, and Nancy Reagan, have written memoirs or autobiographies. The love letters of the Wilsons, Trumans, and Reagans have been published.

Those most involved in their husbands’ political careers include Abigail Adams, Florence Harding (a very colorful character), Eleanor Roosevelt, Rosalyn Carter, and of course Hillary Rodham Clinton. Letitia Tyler, who was only 22 when she entered the White House, and Jane Pierce are rated least involved.

As for those rankings, Eleanor Roosevelt is always #1. Abigail Adams always #2 or #3. Mary Todd Lincoln, Florence Harding, and Jane Pierce are always in the bottom five. Nancy Reagan spent some time there too but lately her star has risen. By and large, in modern times, wives of Democrats fare better than wives of Republicans.

It would have made for real interesting times to have had a First Dude to factor in to all of this. But, ain’t gonna happen, so scholars of first wives can rest easy for a while. I would like to see that terminology “fist lady” changed, though.

Mary Todd Lincoln
The real Mrs. Lincoln
Where is Nancy Hanks now?
More on Nancy Hanks (the trotting horse)
Lady Mary Chudleigh (1656-1710)

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

6 Comments

  • 1. Georgia Green Stamper replies at 17th June 2008, 8:32 am :

    Although she was “Debutante of the Year” in 1947-48, and spent her high school years at Miss Porter’s - in fairness, I would not categorize Jackie Kennedy’s formal education as “finishing school.” She attended Vassar for two years; studied for a year at The University of Grenoble and the Sorbonne; and received a degree from George Washington University in French literature. She did some additional studies in American history at Georgetown University in the early years of her marriage.

  • 2. Tommy replies at 17th June 2008, 9:20 am :

    “within the parameters of public opinion, prevailing sex role norms, and historical precedent.”

    And woe betide any woman who steps outside of that. She’ll get called names and accused of infidelity and murder.

    Bitter? Moi? Perish the thought!

  • 3. sherry replies at 17th June 2008, 10:53 am :

    Thank you for pointing this out, Georgia. It gives me a chance to say that I think there are some flaws in a study of this kind. Although, to give them credit, Watson et al. are primarily concerned with Mary Todd Lincoln and they do, in the text, discuss how difficult it is to compare first ladies, nevertheless, to reduce Vassar and the Sorbonne to “college” sets up a false comparison to something like Laura Bush’s “graduate school” which is a library science degree at Univ Texas.

    Which is not to denigrate the library science degree, mind you. It’s just that the two kinds of education have almost totally difference purposes.

    And of course all those “nones” on the list mean only that women in the 18th & early 19th century did not receive formal education. It doesn’t mean that women like Martha Washington and Dolley Madison were not highly accomplished and sophisticated women.

    One other thing I should bring up is that I found at least one error in the article. Abigail Adams’s name is missing from the 2003 ranking poll. I’m pretty sure she was included, so I have to assume that the error was introduced either by the authors or the editors.

  • 4. Jessie Carty replies at 17th June 2008, 5:29 pm :

    Fascinating :)
    So glad I found your blog!

  • 5. sherry replies at 18th June 2008, 6:11 am :

    Here’s some reading, Tommy:

    The Fall and Rise of Hillary Clinton:

    What strikes me as inarguable is that Hillary is today a more resonant, consequential, and potent figure than she has ever been before. No longer merely a political persona, she has been elevated to a rarefied plane in our cultural consciousness. With her back against the wall, she both found her groove and let loose her raging id, turning herself into a character at once awful and wonderful, confounding and inspiring—thus enlarging herself to the point where she became iconic. She is bigger now than any woman in the country. Certainly, she is bigger than her husband. And although in the end she may wind up being dwarfed by Obama, for the moment she is something he is not: fully, poignantly human.

  • 6. sherry replies at 18th June 2008, 10:31 am :

    Thanks, Jessie. The feeling is mutual! Us Wordpress-blogging poets gotta stick together.

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <strong>