Sherry Chandler » Character assassination in your own back yard

Character assassination in your own back yard

Larry Webster’s column in today’s Lexington Herald-Leader is entitled Cover Stories for Obama Opponents. Unfortunately, it begins with one of the most egregious cover stories for Clinton opponents: Hillary is a monster. OR, to use Lambert’s formulation, Why Won’t that Stupid Bitch Quit. Here are the first four paragraphs:

My wife, Cheryl, and I once landed at a Zimbabwe airport only to find great hubbub and celebration. When we asked what was going on we learned that then-first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton and her daughter, Chelsea, were arriving, too.

We wondered why they were there, and for years Cheryl claimed that every spring break, Hillary Clinton took her daughter somewhere overseas on tax money.

That was when we saw through a glass darkly. But now it is clear that Hillary Clinton went to Harare to learn political exit tactics from Robert Mugabe. He is having his opponents beaten.

It is already fairly legal in America to beat a black person, so Clinton still has that option. It is easy for her to keep running since the only cost to the country is driving races apart.

I graduated from Owen County High School with Larry Webster back in 1963. We were teen rebels together, or possibly just too sassy and full of ourselves to know when to keep our mouths shut and so smart we could get away with murder. We worked on the school newspaper together and the yearbook. We both had character roles in the senior play.

After getting his JD, Larry decided to practice law in Pike County in the deeps of Kentucky’s mountains where he lives the Libertarian values he preaches, growing his own food, living and buying locally, and defending civil liberties.

There are many things to admire about Larry, but logical thinking doesn’t seem to be one of them. Granted, he is not wrong in saying that there are people in Kentucky who will vote against Barack Obama for the wrong reasons rather than voting for Hillary Clinton for the right reasons. Exit polls in West Virginia, whose demographics are very like ours, indicated that 8% of Democrats voting said race was the most important issue. I’ll grant you that people lie, but still, the number is low. Nevertheless, in a state with a stained past, it’s valid to point out the logical fallacies of the racists.

Unfortunately, by opening his argument with the very ugliest kind of Hillary bashing, Larry has given up all credibility. He is doing to Hillary Clinton precisely what he has accused racist Kentuckians of doing to Barack Obama. Making a vicious ad hominem attack with no reference to any fact.

I am furious with him, and all the moreso because our connection goes back so far.

Are there reasons to vote for Barack Obama? I’m sure there must be, but Larry doesn’t give us any. He tells us Obama is

a brilliant young man of principle with sparkling common sense and not owned by any master

but we have to take his word for it. He doesn’t give us any examples or tell us why these characteristics necessarily make Obama the best choice for President. That’s more ad hominem argument.

Then there’s this paragraph. I don’t know what this is about, whether it’s supposed to be parody or mouth-frothing righteous anger. After listing one of the racist cover stories as They say Obama wouldn’t be sworn in on the Bible, there’s this:

Listen and listen good. We real Americans are only going to tell you once before we run your ass off. The Bible is a Holy Book of one of many religions of the American people. Real Americans will die for the right of those who believe the Bible to use or not use it however they want. We will fight for the right of every American not to have to pay homage to somebody else’s religion.

If you don’t believe that, get your stuff and get out — and take that stupid lapel pin with you.

Is this the racist speaking? Or Larry speaking to the racist? I don’t know.

I’m as prejudiced against flag pins as anybody but still…

Either way I’m sad to say, if you’re looking to divide the country and stiffen the backs of Clinton supporters against Obama, Larry’s column makes a damn good start.

_________________________

By the way, I have a letter to the editor in today’s Herald-Leader. My letter is in response to a column by Charles Baker in last Sunday’s paper. Mr. Baker also exhorted me to vote for Barack Obama because he is black and I am white. (That column has already gone behind the archival curtain. Short abstract here.)

The letter is truncated in the paper. Here is the long version:

So Charles Baker would have me vote for Barack Obama because I am a guilty white person, without regard for the fact that Senator Obama has promised to “fix” a Social Security program that isn’t broken, that he has a weaker health care proposal than does Senator Clinton, that he has promised a Reagan/Bush foreign policy, or that he has referred to the Republican party as the party of ideas.

Mr. Baker is right. Kentucky has a shamefully racist past, but I cannot atone for that past by voting for Senator Obama when I don’t think his policies are the best ones for the Democratic party or the nation, and maybe not even for African Americans. It’s just as racist to vote for the black guy because he’s the black guy as it is to vote against the black guy because he’s the black guy.

Although the student Mr. Baker remembers may or may not have changed his mind about the innate superiority of white basketball players, time and the facts have proved him wrong. I doubt you’d find many Kentuckians today who would argue that point. We may be racist but we like to win.

By the same token, I think Kentucky’s voters are capable of looking beyond their putative racism in deciding who they will vote for in the primary. Your poll shows that the economy is Kentucky’s chief concern. If Kentuckians thought Senator Obama’s economic policies would ease our pain, I think they’d vote for him.

Possibly related posts:

    Character assassination
    Clinton Derangement Syndrome
    Department of second thoughts
    I have eaten squirrel brains and I am not demented
    Hmmm

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

8 Comments

  • 1. koshembos replies at 19th May 2008, 2:00 am :

    We get the leaders we deserve. We have way too many Websters and Bakers, whose attitude towards Hillary Clinton is downright racist, for whom Obama with his policies, race baiting and racism towards women and blue collar is the right leader.

    We have Bush and may get Obama and deserve them.

  • 2. sherry replies at 19th May 2008, 6:13 am :

    Oh koshembos, I never thought I’d agree with Clarence Thomas about the time of day but these white men don’t seem to realize how patronizing they are, how much they belittle their own candidate, Barack Obama, by insisting that we owe him the vote because of racial guilt or by insisting that Hillary Clinton is divisive just for having the temerity to run successfully against him.

    Larry Webster is a gadfly but comparing Hillary Cinton to Mugabe, and by association, to the KKK types who lynch and beat black men he went way too far. That. is. not. funny.

  • 3. Tommy replies at 19th May 2008, 10:46 am :

    “not owned by any master”
    Keff*Keff*Hack*Splutter — Whaaat?!
    Did Mr. Webster choose that phrase with careful consideration and thought? Or did he just plop it in, some boilerplate that got him 5 words closer to his total count? Because either way, I think he ought to have thought twice. Does he know of whom he speaks?

  • 4. sherry replies at 19th May 2008, 12:08 pm :

    Yes, Tommy, I think he knows exactly what he’s doing here. He’s saying we can’t stand it because Barack Obama is free and nobler and better in every way than we are. This is my chance to quote Gene Lyon:

    Screaming “racist” at people—I’ve received a grand total of two e-mails from Obama supporters that didn’t—only makes things worse. Real bigots don’t care, while Clinton supporters increasingly resent the accusation. (My skin’s thicker than most. ) Most also think it’s a foolhardy way to avoid discussing the realities of the Electoral College, which is what Clinton was trying to do. Regardless of why working-class white voters don’t support Obama, no Democrat can win without them.

  • 5. Max replies at 19th May 2008, 1:41 pm :

    Well … We have all noticed that 92% of the colored vote is going to him but derogatory belittling names aren’t slung at them.

  • 6. Tommy replies at 19th May 2008, 5:52 pm :

    And what derogatory belittling names can we sling at them that would preserve our portion of the moral high ground?

  • 7. sherry replies at 20th May 2008, 7:54 am :

    Yes, Tommy, the moral high ground is important and Hillary Clinton says nary a word in denigration of Barack Obama or his voters. But at the very least, Obama needs to reel in his supporters. Stuff like this makes me feel a little bit back-lashy:

    The legions of pseudonym-laden online posters who follow in political punditry’s wake are less restrained in describing the shortcomings of Sen. Clinton’s Appalachian supporters. They suggest it has to do with her voters being racist, toothless, shoeless, and prone to marrying their cousins.

    What moral high ground do they stand on?

  • 8. sherry replies at 20th May 2008, 8:03 am :

    Well, Max, African Americans are voting their favorite son and I say more power to them. I can see how Obama’s candidacy would mean a great deal to them, though some of the folk at the < a href="http://www.blackagendareport.com/">Black Agenda Report think they’ve given their votes away pretty cheap.

    [Added: And to be fair, I don't think it's the African Americans who are saying mean things about Clinton. If polling is any indication, the African American community seems willing enough to vote for Clinton if she's the nominee.]

    But I just don’t think you can dismiss the entirety of the vote that’s going to Clinton as racist backlash. Obama has real issues problems that are getting buried in all the talk of racism and he really needs to address these issues if he wants to win the general election. Calling Appalachian whites ignorant and toothless isn’t going to get it.

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <strong>