Sherry Chandler

from Charles O. Hartman, Free Verse. An Essay on Prosody (Northwestern University Press, 1980):

Robert Bridges saw all forms as balancing convention with discovery. That the writer of free verse can count on obtaining certain effects by the use of certain rhythmic devices, he argued, “implied that they are what other ears are prepared to accept, and such effects can only be the primary movements of rhythm upon which all verse has always depended” [from "A Paper or Free Verse," North American Review, 216 (Nov. 1922), 547-58]. “What other ears are prepared to accept” is conventional. But “the primary movements of rhythm” must have been discovered somewhere in the poetic material or in the human ear or soul or nervous system. Pound claimed that the sonnet exemplified such a discovery. It “occurred automatically when some chap got stuck in the effort to make a canzone. His ‘genius’ consisted in the recognition of the fact that he had come to the end of his subject matter” [from Literary Essays, New Directions, 1968]. Even near the revolutionary beginning (1918), Pound acknowledged that a traditional meter could sometimes be the “absolute rhythm” he sought for each poem. He believed “that most symmetrical [i.e., metrical] forms have certain uses [although] a vast number of subjects cannot be precisely, and therefore not properly rendered in symmetrical forms” [Literary Essays]. It was a question of choosing among available alternatives, not of bowing to the dictates of any convention that could not accommodate the particular character of the individal poem.

Free verse simply presented the most radical alternative, and many poets chose not to avail themselves of it. …Yeat’s “No Second Troy” is not a sonnet, not because it lacks two lines, but because his subject did not accord with the movement implied by the sonnet form. …In “Leda and the Swan,” the accord did exist—though the poem also extended the possibilities of the sonnet. The thrust and return of its thought, its movement from concrete action to meditation on the action called for the sonnet form, as the steady accumulation of impassioned questions in “No Second Troy” did not. …Finally, I would argue that the writing of metrical verse was generally improved by the whole atmosphere of new and experimental attention to form.

When it comes to de-fence, Bush is a class act.

From Melissa del Bosquethe in the Texas Observer:

Just 69 miles north, Daniel Garza, 76, faces a similar situation with a neighbor who has political connections that reach the White House. In the small town of Granjeno, population 313, Garza points to a field across the street where a segment of the proposed 18-foot high border wall would abruptly end after passing through his brick home and a small, yellow house he gave his son. “All that land over there is owned by the Hunts,” he says, waving a hand toward the horizon. “The wall doesn’t go there.”

In this area everyone knows the Hunts. Dallas billionaire Ray L. Hunt and his relatives are one of the wealthiest oil and gas dynasties in the world. Hunt, a close friend of President George W. Bush, recently donated $35 million to Southern Methodist University to help build Bush’s presidential library. In 2001, Bush made him a member of the Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, where Hunt received a security clearance and access to classified intelligence.

Over the years, Hunt has transformed his 6,000-acre property, called the Sharyland Plantation, from acres of onions and vegetables into swathes of exclusive, gated communities where houses sell from $650,000 to $1 million and residents enjoy golf courses, elementary schools, and a sports park. The plantation contains an 1,800-acre business park and Sharyland Utilities, run by Hunt’s son Hunter, which delivers electricity to plantation residents and Mexican factories.

…

Garza stands in front of his modest brick home, which he built for his retirement after 50 years as a migrant farmworker. For the past five months, he has stayed awake nights trying to find a way to stop the gears of bureaucracy from grinding over his home.

A February 8 announcement by Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said the agency would settle for building the fence atop the levee behind Garza’s house instead of through it, which has given Garza some hope. Like Tamez, he wonders why his home and small town were targeted by Homeland Security in the first place.

“I don’t see why they have to destroy my home, my land, and let the wall end there.” He points across the street to Hunt’s land. “How will that stop illegal immigration?”

Most border residents couldn’t believe the fence would ever be built through their homes and communities. They expected it to run along the banks of the Rio Grande, not north of the flood levees—in some cases like Tamez’s, as far as a mile north of the river. So it came as a shock last summer when residents were approached by uniformed Border Patrol agents. They asked people to sign waivers allowing Homeland Security to survey their properties for construction of the wall. When they declined, Homeland Security filed condemnation suits.

In time, local landowners realized that the fence’s location had everything to do with politics and private profit, and nothing to do with stopping illegal immigration.

Read all of this piece to learn how the fence follows the money, not the border. Short version: cronies and contractors.

I found this link at the Sideshow, where Avedon Carol raises a pertinent point about telecom immunity:

The law requires [the telecoms] to cooperate with lawful warrants, and that they should never be immune from accountability for breaking the law. I’m amazed that Democrats keep failing to use this language. The telecoms broke the law. The administration bribed or coerced them into breaking the law. If the government issues lawful warrants in order to protect our security, the telecoms would be breaking the law if they didn’t cooperate. This seems like pretty simple stuff to me. (Perhaps someone else should say that if the Evil Islamofascist Caliphate really does takeover the US, as the wingers apparently fear, it’s been mighty helpful of the administration to have a mechanism to spy on everyone already in place, hasn’t it?)