Sherry Chandler » Duelling Evangelists

Duelling Evangelists

Mike Huckabee is a real evangelist. His are the strengths and weaknesses of a real evangelist. He’s smart and quick-witted. Maybe even wily (as in let me show you this negative ad I’m not going to run against Romney). Compassionate probably, with a belief in the possibility of redemption for everyone, as long as redemption takes a form he recognizes.

But he has his limits and blind spots. I would never want him to be president of the United States. I think he was right when he said Jesus Christ was too smart to run for political office. Although I’m not sure about the word smart. Perhaps the word should be wise. Religion and politics don’t mix. Shouldn’t mix.

I think both Jimmy Carter and George W. Bush have shown us that, though I hate to use their names in the same sentence.

Still, I appreciate what Huckabee is doing in showing us that George Bush (et al.) is a fake evangelist. Bush (Romney/Guiliani) is at heart a Wall Street Republican, a son of wealth who believes in his own privilege most of all. When he tries to walk the walk, what we get is swagger. When he tries to talk the talk, what we get is smirk. Enough to fool some of the people some of the time.

(When I look at Romney’s fake smile, I see Basil Fawlty, trying to remain congenial and keep a lid on his volcano of temper while all his best-laid plans crumble.)

And I appreciate the ways in which Huckabee is gaming the political system that has been exploiting people like him for decades. His Chuck Norris ad is a beautiful piece of post-modernism that works as political satire while also giving him a Chuck Norris endorsement. Though he appeared on Leno, he’s a Dave-Letterman sort of politician.

Huckabee is refreshing.

He is everything that made me leave the evangelical church behind and everything that makes me want to defend it from those on both sides who want to turn it into a cliché.

And he is creating a fair amount of schadenfreude among liberal bloggers. See, among others, Jane Hamsher on Huckabee and Limbaugh (another fake populist), Kevin Drum, Lance Mannion, who’s pretty smart about the dynamic of the “Southern Strategy.”

As for Barack Obama, I see in his campaign style also a good bit of the evangelist. It’s what an evangelist does, after all. He brings the “good news.” He’s an orator. Martin Luther King, Jr. was an evangelist, after all. Bill Clinton had a little evangelist in him.

Obama, our latest Kennedy clone, is bringing us the feel-good message of liberal humanism and American exceptionalism, sending out code words to the right (social security) and to the left (against the war) without being any too specific about what he stands for.

We, the people, love this message and we buy it over and over again. Sometimes to our good, sometimes not.

So, the way I see it right now, we have a race of two populist evangelicals. Not necessarily a bad thing. We could use some fresh faces in politics, a leader needs passion and charisma, and the people need some attention after decades of Reaganism.

But charisma is from the shadow side.

Best to remember that.


Meanwhile, Kevin Drum also puts his finger on what it is that makes me root for Hillary when I’m not really all that enthusiastic about the prospect of another Clinton presidency:

As long as we’re laying our cards on the table, this is one of the things that keeps me on Hillary’s side regardless of anything to do with issues or tactics or rhetoric or anything else. I just hate the idea that the fever swamp has been able to turn a perfectly decent liberal woman into such an object of malign loathing. If she loses, then she loses. But by God, I don’t want her to lose because millions of Schiffren’s fellow travelers have carried on a 15-year vendetta of sick-minded smears and hatred. Enough’s enough.

He is speaking here of this, from Dan Quayle speech-writer Lisa Schifferen at the National Review Online.

Possibly related posts:

    Romney’s Mormonism
    Couple more quotes
    And again, it’s class
    Gonzalez
    Above the Law?

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

4 Comments

  • 1. Alan Bender replies at 6th January 2008, 11:27 am :

    Wouldn’t it be nice if it were this simple? The very fact that people can place trust in an “evangelist” with a clever tongue only serves to emphasize the state of confusion. Pundits who offer cogent elaborations only serve to affirm their own confusion. I don’t pretend to understand it either so i composed a poem about it.

  • 2. sherry replies at 6th January 2008, 11:58 am :

    Well, Alan, I hope I’m not functioning as a pundit here. Or as a Huck supporter. I’m as confused as you are. And I like the poem. Great personna, great lines.

    I tried not to write this post. I’ve wanted to stay out of this because I’m not reacting particularly rationally to any of it. Poem is probably better but I write a different kind of poem than you do.

    Maybe we should both be cartoonists.

  • 3. Alan Bender replies at 6th January 2008, 8:23 pm :

    Point well taken Sherry. There are some good observations in the post, and I certainly don’t want to brand you with punditry. You are much to clever and observant for that, but with rush of news around us it is hard to sort it all out and sometimes I just sit on the sidelines and well, you get the picture. I have great regard for your site and the courage to make informed comments and posts. Thank you for doing what you do.

  • 4. sherry replies at 7th January 2008, 8:48 am :

    Thank you, Alan. You’ve made my day.

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <strong>