Sherry Chandler » The costs of a private army
The costs of a private army
The use of “security contractors” in Iraq is one of my hobbyhorses. Here is a new report in the Washington Post that illustrates why I think their use is so wrongheaded:
BAGHDAD — The convoy was ambushed in broad daylight last Nov. 16, dozens of armed men swarming over 37 tractor-trailers stretching for more than a mile on southern Iraq’s main highway. The attackers seized four Americans and an Austrian employed by Crescent Security Group, a small private security firm. Then they fled.
None of the hostages has been found, eight months after one of the largest and most brazen kidnappings of Americans since the March 2003 invasion.
…
An investigation by The Washington Post found that Crescent violated U.S. military regulations while being paid millions of dollars to support the U.S.-led mission in Iraq. The company routinely sacrificed safety to cut costs. On the day of the kidnappings, just seven Crescent guards protected the immense convoy as it drove through southern Iraq, a force that security experts described as inadequate to fend off a major attack.
…
[Scott] Schneider oversaw Crescent’s security operations for more than two years, despite having pleaded guilty, according to court records, to misdemeanor charges of breaking and entering and domestic violence in Michigan in the mid-1990s. Under U.S. law, it is a felony for domestic violence offenders to carry firearms, a prohibition that was adopted by the Defense Department for military and civilian personnel.
There has been no oversight. You have to have oversight. Read this whole article.
Here’s the next installment: For Abducted Guards, Iraq Wasn’t Just About Money
All four missing Americans are military veterans; two — [Jonathan] Cote and Joshua Munns, a 24-year-old former Marine from Redding, Calif. — did combat tours in Iraq. Their comments reveal men acutely aware of their vulnerability, yet driven by life choices that transcend mercenary stereotypes. To a man, they said they had come to Iraq for fast money. But they were also lured by the camaraderie they had known in the military, the continuous rush of adrenaline, the opportunity to see history unfold and the chance to escape mundane lives back home.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.



2 Comments
1. Charles W. replies at 1st August 2007, 8:54 am :
If the so-called private security people are in Iraq that means they are not here breaking strikes and supporting the neo-conservative cause in other ways. Let them stay as long as they want. If I were putting a price on my life, though, it would be more than a measley $7,000 a month.
It seems to me that the author of the article contradicted his own title when he wrote that each man he interviewed admitted that it was the money he was after.
Let us not misplace our sympathy.
2. sherry replies at 1st August 2007, 9:44 am :
It seems to me Charlie that we’ve always wanted to make heroes out of outlaws, that is, folk we wouldn’t actually want to live with: bounty hunters, gunslingers, Rambos.
Leave a comment