Sherry Chandler » What Terrorists Want

What Terrorists Want

Just read a Christian Scientist Monitor review of an intriguing sounding book that I’ll probably never read — so many of them out there. This one is What Terrorists Want: Understanding the Enemy, Containing the Threat by Louise Richardson.

Richardson is a Harvard-educated academic in the field of international security but she was born an Irish Catholic, was 14 at the time of Bloody Sunday. So she knows a bit at first hand about terrorism and its appeal.

Some snippets from the review:

“Terrorists see the world in Manichean, black-and-white terms; they identify with others; and they desire revenge,” according to Richardson.

Lots of people are called “terrorists” by their enemies, of course. That doesn’t mean they all are. Terrorism’s true definition, Richardson writes, is “deliberately and violently targeting civilians for political purposes.”

Terrorists want change, but lack the strength to prevail in other political or military ways. Individual terrorists are generally disaffected people, from any level of society. They encounter an enabling group (such as radical Islamists at a local mosque) who spout an ideology that purports to justify violent actions.

Their motivations can be summed up in a three-word phrase, according to Richardson: “Revenge, Renown, Reaction.”

September 11 did not change the world, she argued. It simply — and brutally — made the US aware of a world that was already occurring.

The rhetoric of declaring war on terrorism, she argues, is a mistake. Terrorism is a tactic, and thus cannot be defeated; what can be defeated, or at least contained, are individual groups of terrorists.

Thus her “Six Rules”:

• Have a defensible and achievable goal, such as stopping the spread of Islamist militancy.

• Live by your principles. No more Abu Ghraibs.

• Know your enemy.

• Separate the terrorists from their communities.

• Engage others in countering terrorists with you.

• Have patience and keep your perspective.

A few of these characteristics look familiar. Viewing the world in black & white, good & evil, with us or against us terms, for example, is a characteristic of the Bush administration. We are also, or at least we were in the beginning, out for revenge. And we are being told that any kind of torture and destruction is justified to defeat our evil enemy.

In short, we are impatient and we have lost our perspective. We react but don’t think.

We’re playing the enemy’s game.

Possibly related posts:

    Terrorists should be treated as criminals
    A Loser’s Tactic
    Fear and Monstering
    Darth Vader: Evil in a Crunchy Candy Shell
    Freedom and power

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

6 Comments

  • 1. Rosalie O'Leary replies at 21st September 2006, 1:08 am :

    Sherry, have you read Robin Morgan’s Demon Lover? I read it years ago when it first came out, and then again after Sept. 11. I recommend it to you and your other readers as a good feminist perspective on terrorism. — Rosalie

  • 2. sherry replies at 21st September 2006, 9:58 am :

    I have not read that book Rosalie but I shall go on the look for it. Meanwhile, readers can find a review here at peacework magazine for August 2005:

    One of the glib clichés that circulated after September 11 was that the attacks had “changed the world.” As if no other country had ever been attacked — never mind attacked by the US government. The Demon Lover, however, was written in 1989, and the benefits of this seeming datedness are disconcerting. Probably “the world” didn’t change, but reading this book made me realize once again how profoundly our country has changed…

    The event that “changed the world” is a myth that I keep finding debunked lately in my reading.

    I am also interested to see some one pointing out the pernicious element of Joseph Campbell’s myth of the hero (as most popularly depicted in Star Wars):

    In a particularly insightful chapter, Morgan explores the claustrophobic vision of masculine heroism. “‘The hero of yesterday becomes the tyrant of tomorrow, unless he crucifies himself today,’” Joseph Campbell writes, and Morgan provides a brilliant reassessment of his description of the hero’s journey, interwoven with the profile of a terrorist. The result is a disconcerting composite of a glorified male hero that fits the revolutionary Che Guevera, the terrorist Andreas Baader, and the engineers of an “ejaculatory politics” based on “soft targets,” “surgical strikes,” “war games,” and “defensive offense” (139). At the heart of this revised profile is the tension Campbell identifies but never questions: that all violent revolutions are inevitably vicious circles, Oedipal exchanges of power. “If the son’s violence appears when the father’s power is in jeopardy, then what conclusion might we draw from the fact that both of them, throughout history, have been using violence as if it were their only course?” (84).

    Obviously, I need to read this book. Can’t think how I missed it.

  • 3. Jeff Hess replies at 23rd September 2006, 10:14 am :

    Shalom Sherry,

    I caught Richardson the Diane Rehm Show last week and was very impressed with her understanding of what the tactic of Terrorism means and what the World is facing. I have her book on order from the library.

    B’shalom,

    Jeff

  • 4. Jeff Hess replies at 23rd September 2006, 10:15 am :

    Shalom Sherry,

    I caught Richardson the Diane Rehm Show last week and was very impressed with her understanding of what the tactic of Terrorism means and what the World is facing. I have her book on order from the library.

    B’shalom,

    Jeff

  • 5. Have Coffee Will Write &r&hellip replies at 23rd September 2006, 10:16 am :

    [...] 7;ve decided to link to those blog posts that have compelled me to leave a comment. 1015 What Terrorists Want 1003 Yes or No 0957 Answering Language 0918 A Market-Based Solution That Wor [...]

  • 6. sherry replies at 23rd September 2006, 12:52 pm :

    I’ll be looking forward to your comments about the Richardson book, Jeff. I wish we could all think about this issue. But I guess that’s too much to ask.

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <strong>