Mock orange. Which can be nearly as invasive as wild roses, I’ve discovered. We cut these canes back severely every year and still they are profuse in spring.
Thanks, Terry.
3.
MW
replies at 24th May 2006, 4:06 pm :
Is this one of the pictures you took yesterday morning, or did you go out again this morning? Either way, it’s very nice.
4.
sherry
replies at 24th May 2006, 4:45 pm :
Oh you gave me away. Yes, I actually took this photo yesterday morning — at 6:31 a.m.
Heh! The information available in “properties” will trip you up every time. Back in February, Brian Kerbs from the Washington Post did an online article about a young man who operated a spamming botnet. The hacker agreed to be interviewed only if he wasn’t identified by name or home town. Unfortunately (for the young man, but not so unfortunately for the rest of us), the Washington post article included a picture of the hacker’s setup. Checking the properties of the picture yielded not only the date and camera info, it also included information about the location and photographer, which had been inserted at time of editing.
Sherry Chandler has received professional development funding and a Professional Assistance Award through the Kentucky Arts Council, a state agency in the Commerce Cabinet, supported by state tax dollars and federal funding from the National Endowment for the Arts, which believes that a great nation deserves great art.
5 Comments
1. Terry replies at 24th May 2006, 10:52 am :
Beautiful! Wild roses?
2. sherry replies at 24th May 2006, 10:54 am :
Mock orange. Which can be nearly as invasive as wild roses, I’ve discovered. We cut these canes back severely every year and still they are profuse in spring.
Thanks, Terry.
3. MW replies at 24th May 2006, 4:06 pm :
Is this one of the pictures you took yesterday morning, or did you go out again this morning? Either way, it’s very nice.
4. sherry replies at 24th May 2006, 4:45 pm :
Oh you gave me away. Yes, I actually took this photo yesterday morning — at 6:31 a.m.
5. Gin replies at 25th May 2006, 8:58 am :
Heh! The information available in “properties” will trip you up every time. Back in February, Brian Kerbs from the Washington Post did an online article about a young man who operated a spamming botnet. The hacker agreed to be interviewed only if he wasn’t identified by name or home town. Unfortunately (for the young man, but not so unfortunately for the rest of us), the Washington post article included a picture of the hacker’s setup. Checking the properties of the picture yielded not only the date and camera info, it also included information about the location and photographer, which had been inserted at time of editing.
Leave a comment